The Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) has recently extended their workers compensation program, a move that has been met with a fair share of controversy. The program, which is definitely a thinly veiled attempt to control employee treatment options, has been met with a surprising lack of resistance from the union.

The crux of the issue lies in the program’s stipulation regarding the use of in-network doctors. According to the program’s guidelines, employees are required to use an in-network doctor for the first 30 days of treatment. After this period, employees are allowed to opt-out of the Certified PPO if they so choose. However, the MTA retains the right to require a second opinion.

This raises a significant question: What happens if an employee wishes to see an out-of-network doctor? The program’s current structure seems to limit the freedom of employees to choose their own healthcare providers, potentially compromising the quality of their care.

The truth is this program is less about helping employees and more about controlling their treatment options. They suggest that the MTA’s insistence on using in-network doctors is a way to keep employees available for work, even if it means compromising their health.

Ironically, this type of strict governance regarding workers compensation usually comes with jobs that feature unlimited sick time as a part of their bargaining package. This unprecedented move by the MTA clearly displays their clear message of service over employees health & safety.

The union’s apparent acceptance of this program has also raised eyebrows. If the union does not challenge the program, it could be seen as a tacit endorsement of a policy that could potentially harm its members. This has led to accusations of a secret side deal, with critics pointing to the union’s previous support for a controversial contract provision known as “gainsharing”.

The roots of this program can be traced back to the 2017 – 2019 contract, negotiated by then Local 100 union president John Samuelsen. Despite the controversy surrounding the program, union representatives, including then VP Richie Davis, encouraged members to vote in favor of the contract.

Every union representative from Stand United shares responsibility for the program’s implementation. However, it’s worth noting that the language of the contract stipulated that the PPO network would be implemented no later than December 31st, 2017. It’s now almost six years later, and the program is only just being put into effect.

This delay could potentially provide grounds for a grievance that the union could win. However, the union’s initial agreement to the program in 2017 undermines their position. The MTA’s delay in implementing the program, they suggest, does not absolve the union of its responsibility to protect its members.

In conclusion, the MTA’s workers compensation program raises serious questions about the rights of employees to choose their own healthcare providers. The union’s response to this program will be a crucial test of its commitment to protecting its members’ interests.

Watch our latest video below regarding Local 100 members selling out Tier 6 members!