In this video, we dive into the potential conflicts of interest surrounding the TWU Local 100 elections. Union members expect transparency, neutrality, and fairness in the election process, but what happens when those overseeing the elections might not be as impartial as they should?

We discuss concerns over Neutral Monitor Barbara Deinhardt and Election Committee Attorney Arthur Schwartz, who have close ties and additional roles as monitor and attorney for the supervisors overseeing Local 100 employees. With both Deinhardt and Schwartz working closely with the incumbent slate, questions arise about their ability to remain unbiased.

Could their friendship or dual roles with union supervisors create a conflict of interest? And, most importantly, how might this impact the fairness of Local 100’s elections?

Join us as we unpack these concerns, analyze the ethical implications, and explore whether union members’ voices are being represented fairly.

If you’re a union member or anyone interested in the integrity of labor elections, this is a conversation you won’t want to miss.

🔔 Subscribe for more updates on union news, election integrity, and member rights.

📝 Comment below if you have any insights or experiences related to union election fairness.

#TWULocal100 #UnionElections #ElectionIntegrity #ConflictOfInterest #LaborRights #UnionTransparency

Join this channel to get access to perks:

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCcGj78lfiLuDPxujO2AaHHw/join

Donate via Cashapp: $ProgressiveAction100